Working less thanks to technological progress

The automation of work is creating an occupational metamorphosis, in which tasks usually done by humans are transferred to a set of technologies. Economics is not spared, and artificial intelligence is also gaining ground. But are economic forecasting algorithms a real alternative to economists?


As a result of the digitisation process of the last decades, huge amounts of data are being generated that are transforming the methods by which we analyse statistical models. Storing, registering, and analysing this constant flow of information has become an essential task for many sectors of the economy.

A technological revolution has opened up new possibilities in economic and financial forecasting capabilities. The analysis of these large databases, known as ‘big data’, would not be possible without artificial intelligence (AI). A rather broad term that encompasses a whole range of ideas.

Even so, there are two concepts in this field: machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), mathematical algorithms that allow computers to identify patterns in data and make predictions by imitating humans. Two computational advances that form the basis of economic forecasting with artificial intelligence.


An algorithmic crystal ball

Experts often compare algorithmic forecasting to “a crystal ball”. Indeed, this metaphor is the title of an internal study published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), in which the authors of the research, Jin-Kyu Jung, Manasa Patnam and Anna Ter-Martirosyan, try to establish whether macroeconomic forecasting algorithms can improve on the results predicted by IMF economists themselves.

The study applies three different machine learning algorithms to a common economic forecasting problem, and the results are surprising. In all three cases, the algorithmic prediction far surpassed the benchmark performance of IMF economists.

In their observations, the authors warn that there are still factors that require further research. They also state that, for these predictions to be truly effective, real-time observations would have to be included. They explain that there is some freedom in the introduction of the parameters used by the algorithms, and that this may be key to determining their effectiveness.

Even so, in their conclusion they agree on the fact that the potential of machine learning in terms of statistical analysis of economic data is evident; and that, although these predictions made by algorithms cannot fully replace the work of economists, they represent a valuable additional reference when making decisions on economic forecasting.

11Onze is the community fintech of Catalonia. Open an account by downloading the super app El Canut for Android or iOS and join the revolution!

If you liked this news, we recommend:


The job of the future: 56 skills to success

3 min read

What will the job of the future look like and what skills...


Work automation: should I be worried?

3 min read

Economists make predictions about where job...


Algorithms now also play at being economists

3 min read

Automation, artificial intelligence and robotics are...

Equip Editorial Equip Editorial
  1. Jordi MorenoJordi Moreno says:

    Cert, els progressos tecnològics són per a millorar el treball obtenint més temps lliure.

    • Jordi CollJordi Coll says:

      Això està molt bé, i ha de ser així, això sí, mantenint la productivitat… Moltes gràcies pel teu comentari, Jordi!!!

      4 months ago
  2. Carles MarsalCarles Marsal says:

    Interessant, gràcies 👌

    • Xavier Vinolas EscodaXavier Vinolas Escoda says:

      Moltes gràcies, Carles. Celebrem que t’hagi agradat!

      4 months ago
  3. Manuel Bullich BuenoManuel Bullich Bueno says:
  4. Jordi MorenoJordi Moreno says:


  5. Joan Santacruz CarlúsJoan Santacruz Carlús says:

Leave a Reply

App Store Google Play