For years, we have been told about inflation, financial crises, housing prices, or artificial intelligence. But there is a much deeper problem advancing slowly and almost silently: demography. There are fewer and fewer workers to support more and more retirees.

According to the latest projections from Spain’s National Statistics Institute (INE), people over the age of 65 will go from representing 20.4% of the current population to more than 30% by the middle of the century. And this directly affects pensions, taxes, and the saving capacity of millions of people. The question is as simple as it is uncomfortable: who will pay for all of this?

A smaller working-age population means fewer social contributions, lower tax revenues, and greater pressure on a welfare state designed for a reality that no longer exists. The public pension system operates on a pay-as-you-go basis: today’s workers pay today’s pensions. But if the contributor base shrinks while spending on pensions, healthcare, and dependency care grows, the balance becomes increasingly fragile.

This is the problem that almost nobody wants to explain clearly. Either economic structures are reformed, or future generations will have to bear higher taxes, more debt, or less generous pensions. Demography makes no noise, but it shapes the future of every economy. And the longer it takes to address it, the higher the bill will be.

The Pyramid Has Turned Upside Down

For much of modern history, Western societies grew on a solid demographic foundation: each generation was larger than the one before it. This meant more workers, more consumers, and more taxpayers to sustain economic activity and public services.

This balance made it possible to finance pensions, universal healthcare, and public education under one very clear assumption: there would always be enough working-age people to pay the bill. But this reality is unraveling. Birth rates are falling, while life expectancy continues to rise.

The result is an increasingly inverted population pyramid. According to Eurostat, the fertility rate in the European Union stood at 1.38 children per woman in 2023, well below the 2.1 needed to ensure generational replacement. In Spain, the figure was 1.12 children per woman, one of the lowest in the European Union. Meanwhile, life expectancy continues to increase. Fewer children are being born, there will be fewer future workers, and the number of retirees continues to grow. The question is not whether this demographic shift will have consequences. The question is who will bear the cost of adaptation.

The Balance That Is Breaking

Many people believe that their social contributions are stored in a personal account to pay for their future retirement. But Spain’s public pension system operates mainly through a pay-as-you-go model: today’s workers finance today’s pensions.

This model is only sustainable as long as there are enough contributors for every pensioner. Decades ago, the ratio was much more favorable. Now, with fewer active workers and more retirees, the balance is weakening. In fact, the Independent Authority for Fiscal Responsibility (AIReF) forecasts that pension spending will continue to rise over the coming decades as a consequence of the retirement of the baby boom generation. The question is unavoidable: how will all of this be paid for?

The pressure does not affect pensions alone. Population aging also increases healthcare expenditure, care services, and dependency-related costs. This forces public budgets to allocate ever more resources to growing structural spending, while the taxpayer base is not increasing at the same pace.

The risk is that younger generations will ultimately bear the burden through higher taxes, higher social contributions, or greater public debt. This may further reduce their ability to save, buy a home, and start a family. It is a vicious circle: lower birth rates create greater future fiscal pressure, and greater fiscal pressure makes it harder to have children.

Can Immigration Solve the Problem?

To maintain current benefits, governments may be forced to increase the tax burden on working-age generations. This means higher social security contributions, higher income taxes, or a greater indirect tax burden on consumption. In a context of strained wages and a high cost of living, this pressure may further reduce families’ ability to save.

The risk is obvious: a generation that pays more, accesses housing later, earns relatively stagnant wages, and faces growing expenses will have greater difficulty building a stable life project. And that includes starting a family. This is the vicious circle of demography: fewer births today mean fewer contributors tomorrow, and fewer contributors tomorrow mean greater fiscal pressure in the future.

Immigration can help offset part of this shortage of working-age population, but it is neither an automatic solution nor a sufficient one on its own. In fact, the INE’s own projections indicate that a significant share of the population growth expected over the coming decades will depend on migration flows. Even so, labor market integration, access to housing, and inclusion policies will remain decisive factors in ensuring that this contribution translates into a real improvement in demographic balance.

Demography is probably the most important economic issue of the 21st century. Not because it happens suddenly, but because it advances slowly while most people look the other way. Pensions, taxes, and the saving capacity of future generations will be determined long before the bill arrives. That is why understanding these changes is not only an economic matter but also a necessity for protecting our financial future, because making good decisions always begins with having good information.

11Onze is the community fintech of Catalonia. Open an account by downloading the app El Canut for Android or iOS and join the revolution!