The gold market is one of the largest and most liquid in the world. Every day, billions of dollars are traded between London, New York, Zurich, Dubai, and Shanghai. It is an asset with more than five thousand years of history, present in central bank reserves and in the portfolios of institutional and retail investors. However, in 2020, one of the world’s largest banks, JPMorgan Chase, admitted to having manipulated precious metals markets for years.

How was it possible to manipulate a market of this magnitude? Are we facing a systemic conspiracy or a more subtle technical mechanism? Understanding the “how” is key to avoiding both naivety and sensationalism.

When we think about the price of gold, we imagine stacked bars inside a vault. But the global price is not primarily determined by the physical metal, but by the financial contracts traded around it.

The reference market is in London, coordinated by the London Bullion Market Association, which sets the “Good Delivery” standard and concentrates a large share of global OTC trading. In New York, the COMEX futures market allows trading contracts with future maturities and plays a key role in price formation through derivatives.

But the map does not end there. Zurich is one of the main global refining and custody centers, hosting some of the world’s largest refineries. Recently, Dubai has consolidated itself as a strategic hub between Africa and Asia, especially in the trade of Dore gold and OTC markets outside the traditional London circuit. In Asia, the Shanghai Gold Exchange has emerged as a key player in the internationalization of gold pricing in yuan, reinforcing China’s growing weight in the physical market.

The global gold price, therefore, is not the result of a single center, but of a dynamic balance between these financial hubs, where physical and derivative markets constantly interact.

The reality is that the volume of futures contracts far exceeds the volume of physical gold that changes hands each day. This phenomenon, often referred to as “paper gold,” means that the price is largely formed in derivative markets. And this is where vulnerability appears.

What is spoofing?

To understand how the gold market can be manipulated, we must first understand how a modern electronic market works. Today, prices are not decided in a crowded trading pit, but on digital platforms where thousands of buy and sell orders compete in fractions of a second.

Each order is recorded in what is called the order book. This book shows, in real time, how many contracts are willing to buy or sell at each price level. It reflects not only executed trades, but also intentions. In financial markets, the perception of intention can move prices just as much as actual supply. This is where spoofing appears.

The 2020 JPMorgan case

In September 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission demonstrated how JPMorgan Chase and several traders, between 2008 and 2016, carried out systematic manipulation practices in gold, silver, platinum, and palladium futures markets through the technique known as spoofing on COMEX.

The mechanism consisted of placing large buy or sell orders with no real intention of executing them. These orders temporarily altered the visible balance of the order book and created the perception of strong imminent buying or selling pressure. When other participants — algorithms, funds, or traders — reacted to this apparent pressure, the price moved slightly. At that moment, the traders cancelled the false orders and executed real trades in the opposite direction, taking advantage of the generated movement. It was not about controlling the global price of gold, but about gaining an advantage from very brief and repeated distortions in market microstructure.

For these actions, JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay approximately 920 million dollars in penalties, while several involved traders were criminally convicted. It was not a suspicion or a speculative theory: it was a judicial resolution with economic and criminal consequences.

Manipulation is not control

The JPMorgan Chase case proves that manipulation is possible, but it also forces us to set boundaries to the narrative. Manipulating short-term movements through microstructure techniques is not the same as structurally controlling the global gold price.

The global gold market has a colossal scale. According to the World Gold Council, the total value of existing gold exceeds 12 trillion euros, and central banks hold more than 35,000 tons as reserves. No private entity can indefinitely sustain a massive distortion without being arbitraged by other actors. In deep and liquid markets, inefficiencies tend to correct themselves.

This does not mean the market is pure or perfect, but it does mean we must distinguish between temporary influence and systemic control. Power in financial markets exists, but it is not omnipotent, and confusing technical manipulation with absolute domination only distances us from rigorous analysis.

It is also true that influence is not always technical. Large banks publish forecast reports that can alter expectations and capital flows. This is part of the market game. The limit appears when conflicts of interest or opaque coordination between research and trading arise. But even here, we speak of influence, not permanent control — and the difference is crucial.

A lesson for the community

The gold market is not a stage of constant conspiratorial engineering. Nor is it a neutral space where all actors compete on equal footing. It is a complex ecosystem where global banks, central banks, refineries, funds, algorithms, and retail investors coexist.

The J.P. Morgan case leaves us with a clear lesson: concentration of financial power can generate distortions. But it also demonstrates that regulators, sanctions, and consequences exist. The manipulation was detected and penalized.

For the 11Onze community, the reflection is even more relevant. Investing in gold is not just buying a metal, but understanding where and how the price is formed. It is distinguishing between physical gold and derivatives. It is knowing that short-term movements may respond to complex financial dynamics, not necessarily to structural changes in real value. The best protection is not fear or viral narratives. It is knowledge.

In an environment where information circulates rapidly and extreme narratives gain audience, preserving wealth also requires preserving judgment. Gold has withstood centuries of monetary instability. But we must learn to withstand misinformation. Because understanding the system is the first step to moving freely within it.

If you want to discover the best option to protect your savings, enter Preciosos 11Onze. We will help you buy at the best price the safe-haven asset par excellence: physical gold.